![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Oh my God, every time I wincingly look back at the ongoing Cultural Appropriation bitchfight of doom, it gets worse. I'm not otherwise going to get involved, but here, I just couldn't help myself.
So, for those, like me, who hadn't seen or heard about Teresa Hayden's post wherein she expresses her anger over people badmouthing her husband (at least, that's what I assume she was doing from the descriptions - I haven't read any of the stuff involving him, either, but apparently he said things that offended people, refused to appologize when called on it, and then deleted his journal because people were yelling at him): Holy fuck, she calls fans of color and those who support them nithings.
In terms of offensiveness, as a former student of old English? Fuck, people, that's, well, not as horrible as the other n-word (which, please God, I hope no one's actually said), but it's pretty god-awful. Like, enough that I was reduced to staring at my computer screen in horror.
She has basically stated that all the people who disagree with her husband (including but not limited to, fans of color) are hateful, malicious, deformed, insane, sexually deviant, possibly cannablistic, sub-human or less-than human things. Because that's what that word means. It means monster. It means Not-a-Person. It means Grendal in Beowulf, the Ring-Wraiths in LotR, the in-bred, cannabalistic degenerate monsters in Lovecraft's "The Lurking Fear."
That's what she's saying fans of color are. Maybe she doesn't really know what the word means and implies, but even if she just thinks it's an old spelling of "nothing" that would be offensive all on it's own.
And to think I used to respect her so much...
ETA: Apparently, there are differences between the Old Norse and Old English definitions, with the Norse one being a far worse insult and the Anglo-Saxon version being a little less on the digusting monster side and more on the outlaw side (see the discussion of several people with more expert knowledge than me in comments). Both versions are still insults, though.
So, for those, like me, who hadn't seen or heard about Teresa Hayden's post wherein she expresses her anger over people badmouthing her husband (at least, that's what I assume she was doing from the descriptions - I haven't read any of the stuff involving him, either, but apparently he said things that offended people, refused to appologize when called on it, and then deleted his journal because people were yelling at him): Holy fuck, she calls fans of color and those who support them nithings.
In terms of offensiveness, as a former student of old English? Fuck, people, that's, well, not as horrible as the other n-word (which, please God, I hope no one's actually said), but it's pretty god-awful. Like, enough that I was reduced to staring at my computer screen in horror.
She has basically stated that all the people who disagree with her husband (including but not limited to, fans of color) are hateful, malicious, deformed, insane, sexually deviant, possibly cannablistic, sub-human or less-than human things. Because that's what that word means. It means monster. It means Not-a-Person. It means Grendal in Beowulf, the Ring-Wraiths in LotR, the in-bred, cannabalistic degenerate monsters in Lovecraft's "The Lurking Fear."
That's what she's saying fans of color are. Maybe she doesn't really know what the word means and implies, but even if she just thinks it's an old spelling of "nothing" that would be offensive all on it's own.
And to think I used to respect her so much...
ETA: Apparently, there are differences between the Old Norse and Old English definitions, with the Norse one being a far worse insult and the Anglo-Saxon version being a little less on the digusting monster side and more on the outlaw side (see the discussion of several people with more expert knowledge than me in comments). Both versions are still insults, though.
Tags:
From:
no subject
I don't know what Teresa Hayden thinks the word means. I don't know if Tolkien used it, or Lovecraft. You are mistaken about the Old English, however.
In Old English, "niðing" or "niþing" means "a villain, one who commits a vile action" (Bosworth-Toller's Anglo-Saxon Dictionary). I looked it up in the Old English Corpus, and these are the only results (the Corpus contains almost all extant Old English):
LawWal B14.37 [Roughly: Law about Plundering the Slain]
1. [0001 (1)] Walreaf is niðinges dæde: gif hwa ofsacen wille, do þæt mid eahta & feowertig fulborenra þegena.
[My trans: "Robbing the slain [see Bosworth-Toller again] is a villain's deed: if one wants to exculpate oneself, one does that with 48 full-born thegns" as oath-supporters--taking "þegena" for "begena," as Bosworth-Toller does.]
ChronC (O'Brien O'Keeffe) B17.7 [The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, MS C]
1. [078310] & se cing þa & eall here cwædon Swegen for niðing; VIII scypa he hæfde ær he Beorn amyrðrode, syððan hine forleton ealle butan II, & he gewende þa to Bricge & þar wunode mid Baldwine.
["And the king then and all the army called Swegen a villain:He had eight ships before he murdered Beorn; afterwards they all left him except two, and he went then to Bridge(?) and lived there with Baldwine."]
The Oxford English Dictionary says: " 1. A coward, a villain; a person who breaks the law or a code of honour; an outlaw."
The word is never used of Grendel. It comes from the root "nið," meaning "hatred" or "enmity." I am in no way defending Teresa Hayden; I think what she said is quite bad enough, and what I've seen of the exchange hardly merits calling the respondents to her husband "villians" or putting them in the same category as those who plunder the dead or murderers! However, the word is not Old English for subhuman or sexually deviant; it's not associated with cannibals there either.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Er, she's not what I'd call precisely agreeing with you. And you'll notice how
From:
no subject
There's always someone out there on lj who will know more about something than I do.
From:
no subject
"You are wrong on this word because you are hysterical"
and
"You are wrong on this word because of X, Y, Z"
Who woulda thunk it?
From:
no subject
I've been both hysterical and wrong before, and no doubt will be again, but in this case I'm hoping that my not being entirely correct won't cause people to be distracted by etymology/conflicting word definitions from the major issues at hand (TNH openly insulting fans of color in a post full of implied threats). Because the fact that I'm very far from an expert on Germanic languages doesn't make that kind of behavior from someone in her position any less awful.
From:
(frozen) no subject
From:
(frozen) no subject
I really would advise everyone to calm down and check your facts. "Nithing" merely means a person whose actions have made them an outlaw. It has nothing to do with monsters, sexually inclined or otherwise.
Likewise, "draggle-tailed" merely means untidy it's an adjective, not a noun and has never been a term exclusive to women, nor does any meaningful definition of it include the word "slut".
Maybe, if people can stop becoming hysterical over words they don't fully understand, this discussion could leave the realms of playground bullying and tackle some of the issues that all the drama queens pretend to care so much about.
Yeah, from where I'm standing, you called her stupid. You didn't call her out by name, but it was most certainly implied that Elspeth was among the "hysterical" people who "don't fully understand" the situation, and are being "playground bullies", not to mention "drama queens".
From:
(frozen) no subject
I think there have been many very intelligent people speaking up in this discussion.
Also, I am freezing this particular portion of the thread, because it's tangential to the main discussion and I don't want it to turn into an exchange of insults or she said/he said argument. Or into dragging other fans' names through the mud.
From:
no subject
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Nith#Eacans:_Legal_definitions_of_earg
Nithings] were aided, guided, or coerced by an evil force to do their evil deeds. Hence, a nithing was not only degenerated in a general [moral] sense [...], it had originally been a human being of evil, fiendish nature that had either sought evil deliberately or had been taken into possession by evil forces unwillingly.
a nithing was not only degenerated in a general [moral] sense [...] This [moral] degeneration was often innate, especially apparent by physical ailments.
(Ernst Klein (1930). "Der Ritus des Tötens bei den nordischen Völkern". Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 28: 177. )
earg/ergi of a nithing was strongly connoted not only with sorcery, unmanliness, weakness, and effeminacy but also especially with lecherousness (lecherous actually being the pivotal meaning of the adjective earg) yielding especially desire for same-sex activities among males, and to slightly lesser degree sexual perversion in general
(Josef Weisweiler (1923). "Beiträge zur Bedeutungsentwicklung germanischer Wörter für sittliche Begriffe". Indogermanische Forschungen 41: 21.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I'm awed by
From:
no subject
I was thinking of corpuses the other day, and of the enormous change computer databases have made -- all those pre-computer scholars laboriously, over a period of years, assembling concordances.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
If it's not used to refer to Grendal in the Beowulf, then I can only bow my head and confess that I'm a bad English major who didn't go back and check first, and that the nithing poles that you see in the new Neil Gaiman Beowulf movie must have misled me (it's not used at all in Lovecraft. The people in the Lurking Fear are an example of the kind of behavior that would have gotten someone declared a nithing in an Old Norse context).
From:
no subject
As I noted, the Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary is now online, if you ever want to use it; I use it quite a lot. Sadly, the newer and far superior Dictionary of Old English being done up at the University of Toronto is only up to the letter "G" and is restricted to subscribers, as is the Corpus of Old English. (The Middle English Compendium, including the Middle English Dictionary and other useful resources, is now free: when the project made back from subscribers the money it had cost, they opened it to the public. "Nithing" also appears there, though I didn't think to look it up there until a few minutes ago.)
We seem indeed to have much more record of the word in Old Norse, as others have pointed out; I'm no expert in that language, but a quick trip to my handy dictionary shows lots more usages than the word ever saw in Old English.
What Teresa Hayden thought she was saying, I don't know. I found the usage bizarre, to say the least. I've read very few of the posts she and her husband made, because they seemed to me to be all heat and no light. You're certainly right that it's an insult, any way you look at the word. I hope my little excursion into English etymology doesn't obscure that point.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
And I admit--the visceral reaction to the word, isn't quite there. I don't react to "nithing" the way I do to a handful of English obscenities & insults I could name; my gut does not clench when I hear it; my mouth does not drop open in shock.
But my eyes narrow, because I recognize it. And then I go through what I know of the meanings. And then I hit the realization that, in this case, she was deliberately trying to slip it past people who won't notice it. And there's a double-layer of contempt there, first to call people en mass by a vile moniker that was only used for individuals, and second for assuming they were too stupid or ignorant to notice.
(There has never been "war against the nithings" because they don't last long, with all good people's hands turned against them, and because to be a "nithing," a person is lacking in all the traits that would allow him to work cohesively with others toward a common goal--honor, trust, loyalty, bravery, and so on. Nithings don't happen in groups.)
What Teresa Hayden thought she was saying, I don't know.
I don't know, either. But I have my guess. TNH is not new to online communication, nor does she casually use words she doesn't understand. The inventor of "disemvowelment" is not unaware of the difference between words that hit straight and hard, and ones you have to interpret before you understand them so they lose their emotional impact without losing the intellectual meaning.
She's no stranger to subtlety and manipulation... She KNOWS. Or she should know. And for someone with her online history, there's no difference. This is a very clear attempt to deeply insult people and then mock them for not understanding the insult.
I expect her to play the "well, you can't be sure what I meant; online communication is so complex; you're overreacting" card when called on it.
She's been blogging too long to get away with "maybe that's not what I meant."
From:
no subject
I hadn't been aware of the usage and connotations in other Germanic languages, and I've just now read your reply above and the post you linked to, having missed it the first time. I didn't know "nithing" was in current use, and I appreciate your post on insanejournal; I've certainly learned from it.
From:
no subject
I don't know TNH, nor the racist Asatru groups, well enough to sort out whether the word includes racist overtones, or just happens to be part of a language associated with a group associated with racist activities. (Mygods, that's too many layers of meta.) I know there are racist Asatru groups (the keyword to search for is "folkish"--not all "folkish" groups are racist, but all the racist ones ID as "folkish"); I don't know if they're more likely to declare people "nithing" than others, and have no idea if it's use on people outside of the groups themselves.
Plenty of modern Norse/Germanic Pagans won't have heard of the term--but none of the ones who do, think it means "lowlife scumbag." They have plenty of more colorful words for that.
As far as "current" use--there are Pagan groups working to revive/reconstruct the religions of the Norse, Egyptian (Kemetic), Celtic, Slavic, Roman, and Greek cultures. This includes active use of a huge collection of words that were never translated to English, or the translations were so mangled through the Christian filter that they're useless. (Most non-Christian forms of clergy, for example, don't translate well.) So all of those groups have at least a handful of words that are considered archaic, but are widely known within the group. Words dealing with religion and magic top the lists.
From:
no subject