ext_1177 ([identity profile] elspethdixon.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] elspethdixon 2006-04-15 06:57 pm (UTC)

Honestly, I think a lot of it is because I could care less about the living celebrities that get written about... I liked Lord of the Rings like most geeks who didn't hate it, but the actors are not the Fellowship and thus are not one tenth as cool.

That's pretty close to my opinions on the subject, as is your comment about people being fair game for fiction so long as they've been dead long enough that nobody who knew them personally is around to get offended on their behalf. I feel... creepy.. when I ponder writing about current or near current people (which is why that Walk the Line plotbunny never got written). Even reading autobiographies of still-living people creeps me out a bit, since, while I'm reading, I project myself into the POV character. Hawkeye can bang BJ and Trapper seven ways from Sunday while I read along gleefully, but reading Alan Alda's autobiography for my mom's book club felt... wierd. And it didn't even have any sex in it ^_^.

"Lawrence of Arabia," the Peter O'toole version, is not only RPF but RPS (if that is not a nonsexual romance, my subtextometer is broken).

Scarily, I know people who've watched this film and not seen any subtext between Lawrence and Ali. Or realised that there was a sexual component to the torture scene (and that part is canon, as is, I suspect, Lawrence/Ali, given that Ali's initials are S.A., which makes me think he's intended to be the one Lawrence dedicates Seven Pillars of Wisdom to). Truly, there are people out skilled enough at ignoring any and all non-het subtext that they could compete with the collective population of Sunnydale in the Denial Olympics.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting