somehow, R-rated girl-on-girl was vastly pornier than NC-17-rated m/m anal sex scenes, because, I don't know, it was hotter?
Ha ha, that is actually exactly how I judge what is NSFW when I am at work. No one can actually see the details of what's on my computer screen (so long as it's text; I don't view sexual or naked or violent images at work and I can't play any sound), but they can see me and my face and body, and hear me. So if something makes me cry, or laugh out loud, or grin like a schmoopy loon, or get all hot and bothered and flushed and squirmy... can't read at work. But if I'm not visibly/audibly going to give it away, it doesn't matter how much sex and swearing and whatnot is on the monitor.
no subject
Ha ha, that is actually exactly how I judge what is NSFW when I am at work. No one can actually see the details of what's on my computer screen (so long as it's text; I don't view sexual or naked or violent images at work and I can't play any sound), but they can see me and my face and body, and hear me. So if something makes me cry, or laugh out loud, or grin like a schmoopy loon, or get all hot and bothered and flushed and squirmy... can't read at work. But if I'm not visibly/audibly going to give it away, it doesn't matter how much sex and swearing and whatnot is on the monitor.