elspethdixon: (Default)
elspethdixon ([personal profile] elspethdixon) wrote2009-01-29 12:44 am
Entry tags:

Holy mother of God *is horrified*

Oh my God, every time I wincingly look back at the ongoing Cultural Appropriation bitchfight of doom, it gets worse. I'm not otherwise going to get involved, but here, I just couldn't help myself.

So, for those, like me, who hadn't seen or heard about Teresa Hayden's post wherein she expresses her anger over people badmouthing her husband (at least, that's what I assume she was doing from the descriptions - I haven't read any of the stuff involving him, either, but apparently he said things that offended people, refused to appologize when called on it, and then deleted his journal because people were yelling at him): Holy fuck, she calls fans of color and those who support them nithings.

In terms of offensiveness, as a former student of old English? Fuck, people, that's, well, not as horrible as the other n-word (which, please God, I hope no one's actually said), but it's pretty god-awful. Like, enough that I was reduced to staring at my computer screen in horror.

She has basically stated that all the people who disagree with her husband (including but not limited to, fans of color) are hateful, malicious, deformed, insane, sexually deviant, possibly cannablistic, sub-human or less-than human things. Because that's what that word means. It means monster. It means Not-a-Person. It means Grendal in Beowulf, the Ring-Wraiths in LotR, the in-bred, cannabalistic degenerate monsters in Lovecraft's "The Lurking Fear."

That's what she's saying fans of color are. Maybe she doesn't really know what the word means and implies, but even if she just thinks it's an old spelling of "nothing" that would be offensive all on it's own.

And to think I used to respect her so much...

ETA: Apparently, there are differences between the Old Norse and Old English definitions, with the Norse one being a far worse insult and the Anglo-Saxon version being a little less on the digusting monster side and more on the outlaw side (see the discussion of several people with more expert knowledge than me in comments). Both versions are still insults, though.
ext_6866: (Default)

Here from Metafandom

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2009-02-01 04:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It does seem like the defenses of words people "don't understand" is just repeating the idea that first caused offense. Whether you add a sexual connotation to "draggle-tailed" or the monster connotation to "nithing" they're all expression the same thing, aren't they?

Draggle-tailed refers to the hem of one's clothing dragging in the gutter. "Nithing" separates the person from the cultured people indoors.

So there's the one side who are out in the gutter being loud-mouths, and they're bothering the cultured, educated people who are trying to have an actual conversation with their opinions. And only the cultured people know the "correct" meanings of their insults, which are apparently just bad enough to show how clever and witty the cultured person is, but not bad enough that the person insulted has a right to accuse them of being vulgar. Even if the person knows that these words have historically meant slut, sexually promiscuous, disgusting and less-than-human--well, they're still showing how uneducated they are for not realizing what definition is correct. So even if you look up the word in a dictionary you're still just showing how incapable you are of following the conversation.